[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:52:41 -0800
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Jian Cai <jiancai@...gle.com>,
Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] Add support for Clang LTO
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:32 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> So I'd recommend to Sami to simply make the Kconfig also depend on
> clang's integrated assembler (not just llvm-nm and llvm-ar).
Sure, sounds good to me. What's the preferred way to test for this in Kconfig?
It looks like actually trying to test if we have an LLVM assembler
(e.g. using $(as-instr,.section
".linker-options","e",@llvm_linker_options)) doesn't work as Kconfig
doesn't pass -no-integrated-as to clang here. I could do something
simple like $(success,echo $(LLVM) $(LLVM_IAS) | grep -q "1 1").
Thoughts?
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
