Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:37:35 +1100 (AEDT) From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> cc: "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 00/12] Landlock LSM On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series simplifies the code, makes stacked access-control more > consistent (from the user point of view), properly handles memory > allocation errors, and adds more tests (covering layered ruleset corner > cases). Most of these changes were sent as a separate patch series: > https://firstname.lastname@example.org/ > > James and Jann, could you please take a look at the main changes > (patches 2, 7 and 8)? We definitely need more review on these changes that came in. I'll drop the previous patchset from my tree and wait until the latest code is fully reviewed. Fundamental locking issues and similar should be worked out before submitting for mainline merge. -- James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.