Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:25:53 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 04:27:47PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:32:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:56:06AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > I do not see these in particular, although I do see a lot of: > > > > > > "sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame" > > > > defconfig-build/vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: msr_write()+0x10a: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame > > defconfig-build/vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: msr_write()+0x99: (branch) > > defconfig-build/vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: msr_write()+0x3e: (branch) > > defconfig-build/vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: msr_write()+0x0: <=== (sym) > > > > $ nm defconfig-build/vmlinux.o | grep msr_write > > 0000000000043250 t msr_write > > 00000000004289c0 T msr_write > > 0000000000003056 t msr_write.cold > > > > Below 'fixes' it. So this is also caused by duplicate symbols. > > There's a new linker flag for renaming duplicates: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391 > > But I guess that doesn't help us now. Well, depends a bit if clang can do it; we only need this for LTO builds for now. > I don't have access to GCC 10 at the moment so I can't recreate it. > Does this fix it? Doesn't seem to do the trick :/ I'll try and have a poke later.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.