[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:21:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, Hongjiu Lu <hongjiu.lu@...el.com>,
joe.lawrence@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
Leaving Josh's proposals here for reference...
> > I'm not sure how LTO does it, but a few more (half-brained) ideas
> > that
> > could work:
> >
> > 1) Add a field in kallsyms to keep track of a symbol's original
> > offset
> > before randomization/re-sorting. Livepatch could use that field
> > to
> > determine the original sympos.
> >
> > 2) In fgkaslr code, go through all the sections and mark the ones
> > which
> > have duplicates (i.e. same name). Then when shuffling the
> > sections,
> > skip a shuffle if it involves a duplicate section. That way all
> > the
> > duplicates would retain their original sympos.
> >
> > 3) Livepatch could uniquely identify symbols by some feature other
> > than
> > sympos. For example:
> >
> > Symbol/function size - obviously this would only work if
> > duplicately
> > named symbols have different sizes.
> >
> > Checksum - as part of a separate feature we're also looking at
> > giving
> > each function its own checksum, calculated based on its
> > instruction
> > opcodes. Though calculating checksums at runtime could be
> > complicated by IP-relative addressing.
> >
> > I'm thinking #1 or #2 wouldn't be too bad. #3 might be harder.
> >
>
> Hi there! I was trying to find a super easy way to address this, so I
> thought the best thing would be if there were a compiler or linker
> switch to just eliminate any duplicate symbols at compile time for
> vmlinux. I filed this question on the binutils bugzilla looking to see
> if there were existing flags that might do this, but H.J. Lu went ahead
> and created a new one "-z unique", that seems to do what we would need
> it to do.
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
>
> When I use this option, it renames any duplicate symbols with an
> extension - for example duplicatefunc.1 or duplicatefunc.2. You could
> either match on the full unique name of the specific binary you are
> trying to patch, or you match the base name and use the extension to
> determine original position. Do you think this solution would work?
Yes, I think so (thanks, Joe, for testing!).
It looks cleaner to me than the options above, but it may just be a matter
of taste. Anyway, I'd go with full name matching, because -z unique-symbol
would allow us to remove sympos altogether, which is appealing.
> If
> so, I can modify livepatch to refuse to patch on duplicated symbols if
> CONFIG_FG_KASLR and when this option is merged into the tool chain I
> can add it to KBUILD_LDFLAGS when CONFIG_FG_KASLR and livepatching
> should work in all cases.
Ok.
Josh, Petr, would this work for you too?
Thanks
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
