Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:49:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> cc: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com>, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, re.emese@...il.com, maennich@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: Add intended executable mode and SPDX license On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:54:05PM +0530, Mrinal Pandey wrote: > > commit b72231eb7084 ("scripts: add spdxcheck.py self test") added the file > > spdxcheck-test.sh to the repository without the executable flag and license > > information. > > > > commit eb8305aecb95 ("scripts: Coccinelle script for namespace > > dependencies.") added the file nsdeps, commit 313dd1b62921 ("gcc-plugins: > > Add the randstruct plugin") added the file gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh > > and commit 9b4ade226f74 ("xen: build infrastructure for generating > > hypercall depending symbols") added the file xen-hypercalls.sh without the > > executable bit. > > > > Set to usual modes for these files and provide the SPDX license for > > spdxcheck-test.sh. No functional changes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@...il.com> > > --- > > applies cleanly on next-20200827 > > > > Kees, Matthias, Thomas, please ack this patch. > > > > Andrew, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch once the > > mainainers ack. > > > > scripts/gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh | 0 > > scripts/nsdeps | 0 > > scripts/spdxcheck-test.sh | 1 + > > scripts/xen-hypercalls.sh | 0 > > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+) > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/gcc-plugins/gen-random-seed.sh > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/nsdeps > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/spdxcheck-test.sh > > mode change 100644 => 100755 scripts/xen-hypercalls.sh > > This does 2 different things in one patch, shouldn't this be 2 different > patches? One to change the permissions and one to add the SPDX line? > For me, this was one thing: minor cleanup; and taking one minor patch is easier than taking two, but you make the call. Then, the two or even three patches would also just travel through different trees, the spdx tree and Andrew's. Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.