Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:13 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>, Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:16:15PM +0530, Allen wrote: > Here's the series re-based on top of 5.8 > https://github.com/allenpais/tasklets/tree/V3 Great! > Let me know how you would want these to be reviewed. Was a Coccinelle script used for any of these conversions? I wonder if it'd be easier to do a single treewide patch for the more mechanical changes. And, actually, I still think the "prepare" patches should just be collapsed into the actual "covert" patches -- there are only a few. After those, yeah, I think getting these sent to their respective maintainers is the next step. > Also, I was thinking if removing tasklets completely could be a task > on KSPP wiki. If yes, I did like to take ownership of that task. I have a > couple of ideas in mind, which could be discussed in a separate email. Sure! I will add it to the tracker. Here's for the refactoring: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/30 and here's for the removal: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94 if you can added details/examples of how they should be removed, that'd help other folks too, if they wanted to jump in. :) -Kees -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.