[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:39:55 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Function Granular KASLR
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Let me CC live-patching ML, because from a quick glance this is something
> which could impact live patching code. At least it invalidates assumptions
> which "sympos" is based on.
In a quick skim, it looks like the symbol resolution is using
kallsyms_on_each_symbol(), so I think this is safe? What's a good
selftest for live-patching?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
