Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:28:13 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, 
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, 
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>, 
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, 
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool,x86_64: Replace recordmcount with objtool

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:29 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:40:42PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>
> > > Not boot tested, but it generates the required sections and they look
> > > more or less as expected, ymmv.
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > index a291823f3f26..189575c12434 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ config X86
> > >     select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
> > >     select HAVE_FAST_GUP
> > >     select HAVE_FENTRY                      if X86_64 || DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> > > -   select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> > >     select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > >     select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > >     select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
> >
> > This breaks DYNAMIC_FTRACE according to kernel/trace/ftrace.c:
> >
> >   #ifndef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> >   # error Dynamic ftrace depends on MCOUNT_RECORD
> >   #endif
> >
> > And the build errors after that seem to confirm this. It looks like we might
> > need another flag to skip recordmcount.
>
> Hurm, Steve, how you want to do that?

Steven, did you have any thoughts about this? Moving recordmcount to
an objtool pass that knows about call sites feels like a much cleaner
solution than annotating kernel code to avoid unwanted relocations.

Sami

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.