Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:26:34 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,  Al Viro
 <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
  Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,  Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
  Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,  Stephen Smalley
 <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,  Christian Heimes
 <christian@...hon.org>,  Deven Bowers <deven.desai@...ux.microsoft.com>,
  Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,  John Johansen
 <john.johansen@...onical.com>,  Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
  "Lev R. Oshvang ." <levonshe@...il.com>,  Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>,  Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,  Eric Chiang
 <ericchiang@...gle.com>,  James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,  Jan Kara
 <jack@...e.cz>,  Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,  Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>,  Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
  Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,  Matthew Wilcox
 <willy@...radead.org>,  Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
  Mickaël Salaün <mickael.salaun@....gouv.fr>,
  Philippe Trébuchet
 <philippe.trebuchet@....gouv.fr>,  Scott Shell <scottsh@...rosoft.com>,
  Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,  Shuah Khan
 <shuah@...nel.org>,  Steve Dower <steve.dower@...hon.org>,  Steve Grubb
 <sgrubb@...hat.com>,  Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut.sautereau@....gouv.fr>,
  Vincent Strubel <vincent.strubel@....gouv.fr>,  linux-kernel
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
  linux-api@...r.kernel.org,  linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,  LSM List
 <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,  Linux FS Devel
 <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How about just O_EXEC? (was Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC)

* Kees Cook:

> I think I misunderstood what you meant (Mickaël got me sorted out
> now). If O_EXEC is already meant to be "EXEC and _not_ READ nor WRITE",
> then yes, this new flag can't be O_EXEC. I was reading the glibc
> documentation (which treats it as a permission bit flag, not POSIX,
> which treats it as a complete mode description).

I see.  I think this part of the manual is actually very Hurd-specific
(before the O_ACCMODE description).  I'll see if I can make this clearer
in the markup.

Thanks,
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.