Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:08:09 +0000 From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Maddie Stone <maddiestone@...gle.com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/21] linux/bit_spinlock.h: Include linux/processor.h On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:39PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > Needed for cpu_relax(). > > Is this needed now, or for the next patch? And if for next patch, why > not just add it then? If the next patch correctly included linux/list_bl.h like it was supposed to, then yes, it's needed there. I'll sort that out and fold this in for v2. Cheers, Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.