[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:28:20 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Maddie Stone <maddiestone@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/21] linux/bit_spinlock.h: Include linux/processor.h
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:39PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Needed for cpu_relax().
Is this needed now, or for the next patch? And if for next patch, why
not just add it then?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
