[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:51:38 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] proc: Clear the pieces of proc_inode that proc_evict_inode cares about
This just keeps everything tidier, and allows for using flags like
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU where slabs are not always cleared before reuse.
I don't see reuse without reinitializing happening with the proc_inode
but I had a false alarm while reworking flushing of proc dentries and
indoes when a process dies that caused me to tidy this up.
The code is a little easier to follow and reason about this
way so I figured the changes might as well be kept.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index c4528c419876..3c9082cd257b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -33,21 +33,27 @@ static void proc_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *de;
struct ctl_table_header *head;
+ struct proc_inode *ei = PROC_I(inode);
truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
clear_inode(inode);
/* Stop tracking associated processes */
- put_pid(PROC_I(inode)->pid);
+ if (ei->pid) {
+ put_pid(ei->pid);
+ ei->pid = NULL;
+ }
/* Let go of any associated proc directory entry */
- de = PDE(inode);
- if (de)
+ de = ei->pde;
+ if (de) {
pde_put(de);
+ ei->pde = NULL;
+ }
- head = PROC_I(inode)->sysctl;
+ head = ei->sysctl;
if (head) {
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(PROC_I(inode)->sysctl, NULL);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(ei->sysctl, NULL);
proc_sys_evict_inode(inode, head);
}
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
