[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:04:26 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] arm64: disable kretprobes with SCS
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 03:42:09PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 9:05 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused as to why that's the case -- could you please
> > elaborate on how this is incompatible?
> >
> > IIUC kretrobes works by patching the function entry point with a BRK, so
> > that it can modify the LR _before_ it is saved to the stack. I don't see
> > how SCS affects that.
>
> You're correct. While this may not be optimal for reducing attack
> surface, I just tested this to confirm that there's no functional
> conflict. I'll drop this and related patches from v5.
Great; thanks for confirming!
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
