[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:39:50 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] arm64: efi: restore x18 if it was corrupted
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 11:20 PM Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> You'll have to elaborate a bit here and explain that this is
> sufficient, given that we run EFI runtime services with interrupts
> enabled.
I can add a note about this in v2. This is called with preemption
disabled and we have a separate interrupt shadow stack, so as far as I
can tell, this should be sufficient. Did you have concerns about this?
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
