[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 10:49:42 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>, Marius Hillenbrand
<mhillenb@...zon.de>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/10] Process-local memory allocations for hiding KVM
secrets
On 6/13/19 10:29 AM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Having said that, I am not too excited to deal with this issue. Do
> people still care about x86/32-bit?
No, not really. It's just fun to try to give history lessons about the
good old days. ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
