[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 20:12:55 -0700
From: hpa@...or.com
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
CC: kristen@...ux.intel.com, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] x86: Add macro to get symbol address for PIE support
On May 20, 2019 4:19:28 PM PDT, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> wrote:
>From: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
>
>Add a new _ASM_MOVABS macro to fetch a symbol address. It will be used
>to replace "_ASM_MOV $<symbol>, %dst" code construct that are not
>compatible with PIE.
>
>Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
>---
> arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
>index 3ff577c0b102..3a686057e882 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
>@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #define _ASM_ALIGN __ASM_SEL(.balign 4, .balign 8)
>
> #define _ASM_MOV __ASM_SIZE(mov)
>+#define _ASM_MOVABS __ASM_SEL(movl, movabsq)
> #define _ASM_INC __ASM_SIZE(inc)
> #define _ASM_DEC __ASM_SIZE(dec)
> #define _ASM_ADD __ASM_SIZE(add)
This is just about *always* wrong on x86-86. We should be using leaq sym(%rip),%reg. If it isn't reachable by leaq, then it is a non-PIE symbol like percpu. You do have to keep those distinct!
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
