[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:22:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: nadav.amit@...il.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linux_dti@...oud.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
will.deacon@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
kristen@...ux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/24] x86: text_poke() fixes and executable lockdowns
* nadav.amit@...il.com <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>
> *
> * This version fixes failed boots on 32-bit that were reported by 0day.
> * Patch 5 is added to initialize uprobes during fork initialization.
> * Patch 7 (which was 6 in the previous version) is updated - the code is
> * moved to common mm-init code with no further changes.
> *
>
> This patchset improves several overlapping issues around stale TLB
> entries and W^X violations. It is combined from "x86/alternative:
> text_poke() enhancements v7" [1] and "Don't leave executable TLB entries
> to freed pages v2" [2] patchsets that were conflicting.
Which tree is this again? It doesn't apply to Linus's latest nor to -tip
cleanly.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
