Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:07:36 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 cl@...ux.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, labbott@...hat.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RFC: add init_allocations=1 boot option

On 4/18/19 8:42 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> Following the recent discussions here's another take at initializing
> pages and heap objects with zeroes. This is needed to prevent possible
> information leaks and make the control-flow bugs that depend on
> uninitialized values more deterministic.
> 
> The patchset introduces a new boot option, init_allocations, which
> makes page allocator and SL[AOU]B initialize newly allocated memory.
> init_allocations=0 doesn't (hopefully) add any overhead to the
> allocation fast path (no noticeable slowdown on hackbench).
> 
> With only the the first of the proposed patches the slowdown numbers are:
>  - 1.1% (stdev 0.2%) sys time slowdown building Linux kernel
>  - 3.1% (stdev 0.3%) sys time slowdown on af_inet_loopback benchmark
>  - 9.4% (stdev 0.5%) sys time slowdown on hackbench
> 
> The second patch introduces a GFP flag that allows to disable
> initialization for certain allocations. The third page is an example of

                                              third patch

> applying it to af_unix.c, which helps hackbench greatly.
> 
> Slowdown numbers for the whole patchset are:
>  - 1.8% (stdev 0.8%) on kernel build
>  - 6.5% (stdev 0.2%) on af_inet_loopback
>  - 0.12% (stdev 0.6%) on hackbench
> 
> 
> Alexander Potapenko (3):
>   mm: security: introduce the init_allocations=1 boot option
>   gfp: mm: introduce __GFP_NOINIT
>   net: apply __GFP_NOINIT to AF_UNIX sk_buff allocations
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c |  2 +-
>  include/linux/gfp.h                    |  6 ++++-
>  include/linux/mm.h                     |  8 +++++++
>  include/linux/slab_def.h               |  1 +
>  include/linux/slub_def.h               |  1 +
>  include/net/sock.h                     |  5 +++++
>  kernel/kexec_core.c                    |  4 ++--
>  mm/dmapool.c                           |  2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c                        | 18 ++++++++++++++-
>  mm/slab.c                              | 14 ++++++------
>  mm/slab.h                              |  1 +
>  mm/slab_common.c                       | 15 +++++++++++++
>  mm/slob.c                              |  3 ++-
>  mm/slub.c                              |  9 ++++----
>  net/core/sock.c                        | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  net/unix/af_unix.c                     | 13 ++++++-----
>  16 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.