Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:09:55 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, keescook@...omium.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ixgbe: Fix incorrect RCU API usage

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 01:34:30AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Recently, I added an RCU annotation check in rcu_assign_pointer. This
> caused a sparse error to be reported by the ixgbe driver.
> 
> Further looking, it seems the adapter->xdp_prog pointer is not annotated
> with __rcu. Annonating it fixed the error, but caused a bunch of other
> warnings.
> 
> This patch tries to fix all warnings by using RCU API properly. This
> makes sense to do because not using RCU properly can result in various
> hard to find bugs. This is a best effort fix and is only build tested.
> The sparse errors and warnings go away with the change. I request
> maintainers / developers in this area to review / test it properly.
> 
> The sparse error fixed is:
> ixgbe_main.c:10256:25: error: incompatible types in comparison expression
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>

>From an RCU perspective:

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h      |  4 ++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> index 08d85e336bd4..3b14daf27516 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ struct ixgbe_ring {
>  	struct ixgbe_ring *next;	/* pointer to next ring in q_vector */
>  	struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector; /* backpointer to host q_vector */
>  	struct net_device *netdev;	/* netdev ring belongs to */
> -	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> +	struct bpf_prog __rcu *xdp_prog;
>  	struct device *dev;		/* device for DMA mapping */
>  	void *desc;			/* descriptor ring memory */
>  	union {
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ struct ixgbe_adapter {
>  	unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
>  	/* OS defined structs */
>  	struct net_device *netdev;
> -	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> +	struct bpf_prog __rcu *xdp_prog;
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>  	struct mii_bus *mii_bus;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index daff8183534b..408a312aa6ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -2199,7 +2199,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ixgbe_run_xdp(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>  	u32 act;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_prog);
> +	xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rx_ring->xdp_prog);
>  
>  	if (!xdp_prog)
>  		goto xdp_out;
> @@ -6547,7 +6547,7 @@ int ixgbe_setup_rx_resources(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter,
>  			     rx_ring->queue_index) < 0)
>  		goto err;
>  
> -	rx_ring->xdp_prog = adapter->xdp_prog;
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(rx_ring->xdp_prog, adapter->xdp_prog);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  err:
> @@ -10246,7 +10246,8 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	if (nr_cpu_ids > MAX_XDP_QUEUES)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	old_prog = xchg(&adapter->xdp_prog, prog);
> +	old_prog = rcu_access_pointer(adapter->xdp_prog);
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(adapter->xdp_prog, prog);
>  
>  	/* If transitioning XDP modes reconfigure rings */
>  	if (!!prog != !!old_prog) {
> @@ -10271,13 +10272,17 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  static int ixgbe_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
>  {
>  	struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>  
>  	switch (xdp->command) {
>  	case XDP_SETUP_PROG:
>  		return ixgbe_xdp_setup(dev, xdp->prog);
>  	case XDP_QUERY_PROG:
> -		xdp->prog_id = adapter->xdp_prog ?
> -			adapter->xdp_prog->aux->id : 0;
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		prog = rcu_dereference(adapter->xdp_prog);
> +		xdp->prog_id = prog ? prog->aux->id : 0;
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  		return 0;
>  	case XDP_QUERY_XSK_UMEM:
>  		return ixgbe_xsk_umem_query(adapter, &xdp->xsk.umem,
> -- 
> 2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.