Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:45:26 -0800
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
 Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Damian Tometzki <linux_dti@...oud.com>,
 linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
 LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
 Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
 Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Dock, Deneen T" <deneen.t.dock@...el.com>,
 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] x86: avoid W^X being broken during modules
 loading

> On Feb 11, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> index 76d482a2b716..69f3e650ada8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> @@ -667,15 +667,29 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void)
>>  * handlers seeing an inconsistent instruction while you patch.
>>  */
>> void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
>> -					      size_t len)
>> +				       size_t len)
>> {
>> 	unsigned long flags;
>> -	local_irq_save(flags);
>> -	memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
>> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
>> -	sync_core();
>> -	/* Could also do a CLFLUSH here to speed up CPU recovery; but
>> -	   that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs. */
>> +
>> +	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX) &&
> 
> Not a fast path - boot_cpu_has() is fine here.

Are you sure about that? This path is still used when modules are loaded.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.