Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 00:25:43 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <>
To: Borislav Petkov <>
CC: Rick Edgecombe <>, Andy Lutomirski
	<>, Ingo Molnar <>, LKML
	<>, X86 ML <>, "H. Peter Anvin"
	<>, Thomas Gleixner <>, Dave Hansen
	<>, Peter Zijlstra <>, Damian
 Tometzki <>, linux-integrity
	<>, LSM List
	<>, Andrew Morton
	<>, Kernel Hardening
	<>, Linux-MM <>, Will
 Deacon <>, Ard Biesheuvel <>,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <>, "Dock, Deneen T"
	<>, Kees Cook <>, Dave Hansen
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] x86/mm: temporary mm struct

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 4:08 PM, Borislav Petkov <> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:19:54PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> Meta-question: could you please review the entire patch-set? This is
>> actually v9 of this particular patch - it was part of a separate patch-set
>> before. I don’t think that the patch has changed since (the real) v1.
>> These sporadic comments after each version really makes it hard to get this
>> work completed.
> Sorry but where I am the day has only 24 hours and this patchset is not
> the only one in my overflowing mbox. If my sporadic comments are making
> it hard to finish your work, I better not interfere then.

I certainly did not intend for it to sound this way, and your feedback is
obviously valuable.

Just let me know when you are done reviewing the patch-set, so I will not
overflow your mailbox with even unnecessary versions of these patches. :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.