[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:06:27 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, Juerg Haefliger <juergh@...il.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, jsteckli@...zon.de, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, liran.alon@...cle.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
deepa.srinivasan@...cle.com, chris hyser <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>, "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
pradeep.vincent@...cle.com, John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, steven.sistare@...cle.com,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 00/16] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:42 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> >> The second process could easily have the page's old TLB entry. It could
> >> abuse that entry as long as that CPU doesn't context switch
> >> (switch_mm_irqs_off()) or otherwise flush the TLB entry.
> >
> > That is an interesting scenario. Working through this scenario, physmap
> > TLB entry for a page is flushed on the local processor when the page is
> > allocated to userspace, in xpfo_alloc_pages(). When the userspace passes
> > page back into kernel, that page is mapped into kernel space using a va
> > from kmap pool in xpfo_kmap() which can be different for each new
> > mapping of the same page. The physical page is unmapped from kernel on
> > the way back from kernel to userspace by xpfo_kunmap(). So two processes
> > on different CPUs sharing same physical page might not be seeing the
> > same virtual address for that page while they are in the kernel, as long
> > as it is an address from kmap pool. ret2dir attack relies upon being
> > able to craft a predictable virtual address in the kernel physmap for a
> > physical page and redirect execution to that address. Does that sound right?
>
> All processes share one set of kernel page tables. Or, did your patches
> change that somehow that I missed?
>
> Since they share the page tables, they implicitly share kmap*()
> mappings. kmap_atomic() is not *used* by more than one CPU, but the
> mapping is accessible and at least exists for all processors.
>
> I'm basically assuming that any entry mapped in a shared page table is
> exploitable on any CPU regardless of where we logically *want* it to be
> used.
>
>
We can, very easily, have kernel mappings that are private to a given
mm. Maybe this is useful here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
