Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:26:26 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk> Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, kbuild-all@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: smp: add support for per-task stack canaries On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:34 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 2:38 AM Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 06:28:11PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > > Hi Ard, > > > > > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > > > Hi, > > > > This looks to me like a false warning - how can a patch touching arch > > code affect the result of lib/test_ubsan.c? Please can you double- > > check this result? > > Yeah, no idea. Do you want me to toss this into the ARM patch queue? > If not, I can this through the gcc-plugin tree. Since the ARM changes are relatively small, and it adds a new plugin, I'll take this via the gcc-plugins tree for -next now. Please yell if this should be done differently. Thanks! -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.