Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:23:09 +0100 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com> Cc: "Stecklina, Julian" <jsteckli@...zon.de>, "tycho@...ho.ws" <tycho@...ho.ws>, "liran.alon@...cle.com" <liran.alon@...cle.com>, "jwadams@...gle.com" <jwadams@...gle.com>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Process-local memory allocations On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 06:04:01PM +0100, Solar Designer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 06:24:08PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > On 22/11/2018 18:40, Stecklina, Julian wrote: > > >On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 10:48 -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > >>>Where is the full set of patches? > > >>>I'm sorry, I searched both KVM and LKML archives, but I couldn't find it. > > >> > > >>It looks like they were only sent to kernel hardening, but not sent to > > >>the archives? I only see our replies here: > > >> > > >>https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/ > > >> > > >>Julian, perhaps you can re-send with a CC to lkml as well? > > > > > >Will do. I messed up the threading, due to git send-email being hostile to > > >me. > > >Sorry for the confusion. > > > > If you are not subscribed to the hardening ml, it will neither archive, > > nor forward to subscribers your emails. > > No. There's no requirement to be subscribed to kernel-hardening in > order to be able to post, nor for messages to be archived. > > > This very mail you wrote is not archived either. > > Julian's message in fact did not appear on kernel-hardening, and the > reason is that Amazon's mail servers - for reasons unknown to me (and to > an Amazoner with whom I tried discussing it before) sometimes(?!) add > the "Precedence: junk" header on messages. ezmlm-idx drops such > messages by default (and this behavior is documented). I'm not eager to > patch this out. ezmlm-idx also drops messages with "Precedence: bulk", > and it sets that header on messages it sends to list subscribers, which > helps against loops. Another reason is to avoid vacation auto-replies, > which I think can use either header. It'd be weird to continue dropping > "bulk", yet start accepting "junk", wouldn't it? But if this is > unfixable on Amazon's end, I'll have to. OK, I've just patched the "junk" check out of ezmlm-reject (processing of messages to the posting addresses), but kept it in ezmlm-weed (processing of messages to the bounce addresses). I hope Julian's messages will be getting through now. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.