Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:36:45 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>, 
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, 
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, 
	linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, 
	LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, 
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, 
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] prmem: documentation

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:33 AM Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> I forgot one sentence :-(
>
> On 13/11/2018 20:31, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> > On 13/11/2018 19:47, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >> For general rare-writish stuff, I don't think we want IRQs running
> >> with them mapped anywhere for write.  For AVC and IMA, I'm less sure.
> >
> > Why would these be less sensitive?
> >
> > But I see a big difference between my initial implementation and this one.
> >
> > In my case, by using a shared mapping, visible to all cores, freezing
> > the core that is performing the write would have exposed the writable
> > mapping to a potential attack run from another core.
> >
> > If the mapping is private to the core performing the write, even if it
> > is frozen, it's much harder to figure out what it had mapped and where,
> > from another core.
> >
> > To access that mapping, the attack should be performed from the ISR, I
> > think.
>
> Unless the secondary mapping is also available to other cores, through
> the shared mm_struct ?
>

I don't think this matters much.  The other cores will only be able to
use that mapping when they're doing a rare write.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.