[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 23:16:35 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
Cc: Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, deneen.t.dock@...el.com, kristen@...ux.intel.com,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] AppArmor: Prepare for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 PM Casey Schaufler
<casey.schaufler@...el.com> wrote:
> A ptrace access check with mode PTRACE_MODE_SCHED gets called
> from process switching code. This precludes the use of audit,
> as the locking is incompatible. Don't do audit in the PTRACE_MODE_SCHED
> case.
Why is this separate from PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT? It looks like
apparmor_ptrace_access_check() currently ignores PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT.
Could you, instead of adding a new flag, fix the handling of
PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT?
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
> ---
> security/apparmor/domain.c | 2 +-
> security/apparmor/include/ipc.h | 2 +-
> security/apparmor/ipc.c | 8 +++++---
> security/apparmor/lsm.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
> index 08c88de0ffda..28300f4c3ef9 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int may_change_ptraced_domain(struct aa_label *to_label,
> if (!tracer || unconfined(tracerl))
> goto out;
>
> - error = aa_may_ptrace(tracerl, to_label, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH);
> + error = aa_may_ptrace(tracerl, to_label, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH, true);
>
> out:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/ipc.h b/security/apparmor/include/ipc.h
> index 5ffc218d1e74..299d1c45fef0 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/include/ipc.h
> +++ b/security/apparmor/include/ipc.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct aa_profile;
> "xcpu xfsz vtalrm prof winch io pwr sys emt lost"
>
> int aa_may_ptrace(struct aa_label *tracer, struct aa_label *tracee,
> - u32 request);
> + u32 request, bool audit);
> int aa_may_signal(struct aa_label *sender, struct aa_label *target, int sig);
>
> #endif /* __AA_IPC_H */
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/ipc.c b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> index 527ea1557120..9ed110afc822 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/ipc.c
> @@ -121,15 +121,17 @@ static int profile_tracer_perm(struct aa_profile *tracer,
> * Returns: %0 else error code if permission denied or error
> */
> int aa_may_ptrace(struct aa_label *tracer, struct aa_label *tracee,
> - u32 request)
> + u32 request, bool audit)
> {
> struct aa_profile *profile;
> u32 xrequest = request << PTRACE_PERM_SHIFT;
> DEFINE_AUDIT_DATA(sa, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NONE, OP_PTRACE);
>
> return xcheck_labels(tracer, tracee, profile,
> - profile_tracer_perm(profile, tracee, request, &sa),
> - profile_tracee_perm(profile, tracer, xrequest, &sa));
> + profile_tracer_perm(profile, tracee, request,
> + audit ? &sa : NULL),
> + profile_tracee_perm(profile, tracer, xrequest,
> + audit ? &sa : NULL));
> }
>
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index 8b8b70620bbe..da9d0b228857 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
> tracee = aa_get_task_label(child);
> error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee,
> (mode & PTRACE_MODE_READ) ? AA_PTRACE_READ
> - : AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
> + : AA_PTRACE_TRACE,
> + !(mode & PTRACE_MODE_SCHED));
> aa_put_label(tracee);
> end_current_label_crit_section(tracer);
>
> @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
>
> tracee = begin_current_label_crit_section();
> tracer = aa_get_task_label(parent);
> - error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
> + error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE, true);
> aa_put_label(tracer);
> end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
