Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:29:24 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Clear the stack Hi Will, On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 01:25:20PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> No worries! I've made the change locally and will push this out to >> -next unless there are objections? > > I'm a bit wary of conflicts in entry.S, since it's likely that we're going > to have a lot going on in there for 4.19. > > Could I take this via arm64 instead, please, or are there dependencies > on other parts of your tree? It depends on the plugin existing, but we could split it up so the arm64 part could go separately. It would just be a no-op in the arm64 tree since CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK won't exist there. Whatever works best for you! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.