[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:18:09 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, jannh@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
security@...nel.org, Benjamin Block <bblock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sg: mitigate read/write abuse
As Al Viro noted in commit 128394eff343 ("sg_write()/bsg_write() is not fit
to be called under KERNEL_DS"), sg improperly accesses userspace memory
outside the provided buffer, permitting kernel memory corruption via
splice().
But it doesn't just do it on ->write(), also on ->read().
As a band-aid, make sure that the ->read() and ->write() handlers can not
be called in weird contexts (kernel context or credentials different from
file opener), like for ib_safe_file_access().
If someone needs to use these interfaces from different security contexts,
a new interface should be written that goes through the ->ioctl() handler.
I've mostly copypasted ib_safe_file_access() over as sg_safe_file_access()
because I couldn't find a good common header - please tell me if you know a
better way.
The duplicate pr_err_once() calls are so that each of them fires once;
otherwise, this would probably have to be a macro.
changed in v2:
- remove the bsg parts per Christoph Hellwig's request
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
index 53ae52dbff84..51b685192646 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static int sg_version_num = 30536; /* 2 digits for each component */
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <linux/uio.h>
+#include <linux/cred.h> /* for sg_safe_file_access() */
#include "scsi.h"
#include <scsi/scsi_dbg.h>
@@ -209,6 +210,23 @@ static void sg_device_destroy(struct kref *kref);
sdev_prefix_printk(prefix, (sdp)->device, \
(sdp)->disk->disk_name, fmt, ##a)
+/*
+ * The SCSI interfaces that use read() and write() as an asynchronous variant of
+ * ioctl(..., SG_IO, ...) are fundamentally unsafe, since there are lots of ways
+ * to trigger read() and write() calls from various contexts with elevated
+ * privileges. This can lead to kernel memory corruption (e.g. if these
+ * interfaces are called through splice()) and privilege escalation inside
+ * userspace (e.g. if a process with access to such a device passes a file
+ * descriptor to a SUID binary as stdin/stdout/stderr).
+ *
+ * This function provides protection for the legacy API by restricting the
+ * calling context.
+ */
+static inline bool sg_safe_file_access(struct file *filp)
+{
+ return filp->f_cred == current_cred() && !uaccess_kernel();
+}
+
static int sg_allow_access(struct file *filp, unsigned char *cmd)
{
struct sg_fd *sfp = filp->private_data;
@@ -393,6 +411,12 @@ sg_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t * ppos)
struct sg_header *old_hdr = NULL;
int retval = 0;
+ if (!sg_safe_file_access(filp)) {
+ pr_err_once("%s: process %d (%s) changed security contexts after opening file descriptor, this is not allowed.\n",
+ __func__, task_tgid_vnr(current), current->comm);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if ((!(sfp = (Sg_fd *) filp->private_data)) || (!(sdp = sfp->parentdp)))
return -ENXIO;
SCSI_LOG_TIMEOUT(3, sg_printk(KERN_INFO, sdp,
@@ -581,8 +605,11 @@ sg_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t * ppos)
sg_io_hdr_t *hp;
unsigned char cmnd[SG_MAX_CDB_SIZE];
- if (unlikely(uaccess_kernel()))
+ if (!sg_safe_file_access(filp)) {
+ pr_err_once("%s: process %d (%s) changed security contexts after opening file descriptor, this is not allowed.\n",
+ __func__, task_tgid_vnr(current), current->comm);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
if ((!(sfp = (Sg_fd *) filp->private_data)) || (!(sdp = sfp->parentdp)))
return -ENXIO;
--
2.18.0.rc1.244.gcf134e6275-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
