Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 12:32:49 +0200
From: Salvatore Mesoraca <>
To: David Laight <>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <>, Andrew Lunn <>, 
	"" <>, 
	Kernel Hardening <>, 
	"" <>, "David S. Miller" <>, 
	Kees Cook <>, 
	Vivien Didelot <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: drop some VLAs in switch.c

2018-05-08 11:39 GMT+02:00 David Laight <>:
> From: Salvatore Mesoraca
>> Sent: 07 May 2018 20:03
> ...
>> This optimization will save us an allocation when number of ports is
>> less than 32 or 64 (depending on arch).
>> IMHO it's useful, if you consider that, right now, DSA works only with
>> 12-ports switches.
> Why not just error out if the number of ports is greater than the compile-time
> limit?
> Worry about dynamic allocation if you need a lot more than 64 ports.

v1 has been NAK-ed by maintainers because they don't want limits on how
many ports a switch can have.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.