Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:20:01 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Martin Uecker <Martin.Uecker@....uni-goettingen.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>, Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] kernel.h: Retain constant expression output for max()/min() On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > > This patch seems finished (*knock on wood*). Do you want to take this > directly for v4.17, should I send a single-patch pull-request, or > should this go through -mm (for either 4.17 or 4.18)? I was actually expecting it to go with the other VLA removal patches, but if the plan is to try to just get them in individual maintainer trees, I guess I can just take this directly. So if it would be a single-commit pull request, I'll just take it as a patch. I guess it could go through -mm, but since I was involved in the discussion anyway, I also don't mind just taking it directly. If it causes problems, I can curse at myself. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.