Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:32:20 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:19:51PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > Thanks. So it's OK to replace kmalloc and kzalloc, even though they > > > didn't previously consider vmalloc and even though kmalloc doesn't zero? > > > > We'll also need to replace the corresponding places where those structs > > are freed with kvfree(). Can coccinelle handle that too? > > Is the use of vmalloc a necessary part of the design? Or could there be a > non vmalloc versions for call sites that are already ok with that? We can also add kmalloc_struct() along with kmalloc_ab_c that won't fall back to vmalloc but just return NULL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.