Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:42:51 +0100 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>, Semi Malinen <semi.malinen@...com>, Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@...bus.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] VLA removal from the GPIO subsystem On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote: > For those who haven't seen it, there's an effort to remove VLAs from the > kernel so we can turn on -Wvla in the name of security. See > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621 for more details and discussion. OK I read up on it, I'm on board! Less is more. > This is a series to remove a few VLAs from the gpio subsystem. These are > compile tested only so I'd appreciate reviews and tests from > maintainers. When these get Acked, I expect these to just go through the > GPIO tree like usual. Sure I will just queue it up with ACKs, or if I just think it looks nice and reliable. Thank you for doing this! Yours, Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.