Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:09:12 +0300 From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Mohamed Ghannam <simo.ghannam@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for it On 21.02.2018 13:05, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:17:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> wrote: >>> On 16.02.2018 21:10, Alexander Popov wrote: >>>> This is the 8th version of the patch series introducing STACKLEAK to the >>>> mainline kernel. I've made some minor improvements while waiting for the >>>> next review by x86 maintainers. >> >> If we can borrow some of luto or tglx's time, I think that'd be best: > > Btw, someone just noticed: why hasn't this patchset ever been sent to > lkml for a wider review? Thanks for that notice. I just realized that I'm resending this patch series to people who I chose approximately 8 month ago, when I started to work on STACKLEAK. I'll use scripts/get_maintainer.pl for the next version. Best regards, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.