Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:09:12 +0300
From: Alexander Popov <>
To: Borislav Petkov <>, Kees Cook <>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <>, Andy Lutomirski <>,
 Kernel Hardening <>,
 PaX Team <>, Brad Spengler <>,
 Ingo Molnar <>, Tycho Andersen <>,
 Laura Abbott <>, Mark Rutland <>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <>, "H . Peter Anvin"
 <>, Peter Zijlstra <>,
 "Dmitry V . Levin" <>, X86 ML <>,
 Mohamed Ghannam <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for

On 21.02.2018 13:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:17:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Alexander Popov <> wrote:
>>> On 16.02.2018 21:10, Alexander Popov wrote:
>>>> This is the 8th version of the patch series introducing STACKLEAK to the
>>>> mainline kernel. I've made some minor improvements while waiting for the
>>>> next review by x86 maintainers.
>> If we can borrow some of luto or tglx's time, I think that'd be best:
> Btw, someone just noticed: why hasn't this patchset ever been sent to
> lkml for a wider review?

Thanks for that notice.

I just realized that I'm resending this patch series to people who I chose
approximately 8 month ago, when I started to work on STACKLEAK.

I'll use scripts/ for the next version.

Best regards,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.