[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:09:12 +0300
From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, "H . Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Mohamed Ghannam <simo.ghannam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 0/6] Introduce the STACKLEAK feature and a test for
it
On 21.02.2018 13:05, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:17:21PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> wrote:
>>> On 16.02.2018 21:10, Alexander Popov wrote:
>>>> This is the 8th version of the patch series introducing STACKLEAK to the
>>>> mainline kernel. I've made some minor improvements while waiting for the
>>>> next review by x86 maintainers.
>>
>> If we can borrow some of luto or tglx's time, I think that'd be best:
>
> Btw, someone just noticed: why hasn't this patchset ever been sent to
> lkml for a wider review?
Thanks for that notice.
I just realized that I'm resending this patch series to people who I chose
approximately 8 month ago, when I started to work on STACKLEAK.
I'll use scripts/get_maintainer.pl for the next version.
Best regards,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
