Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:13:18 -0800 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Cyril Novikov <cnovikov@...x.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] array_idx: sanitize speculative array de-references [ adding Arjan ] On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: [..] > Anyway, I do think the patches I've seen so far are ok, and the real > reason I'm writing this email is actually more about future patches: > do we have a good handle on where these array index sanitations will > be needed? > > Also, while array limit checking was obviously the official > "spectre-v1" issue, I do wonder if there are possible other issues > where mispredicted conditional branches can end up leaking > information? > > IOW, is there some work on tooling/analysis/similar? Not asking for > near-term, but more of a "big picture" question.. > > Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.