Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:29:57 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] get rid of the use of set_fs() (by way of kernel_recvmsg()) in sunrpc > We could turn ->msg_control/->msg_controllen into another > iov_iter, but seeing that we never do scatter-gather for those > IMO that would be a massive overkill. A flag controlling whether > ->msg_control is kernel or userland pointer would do, especially > since we already have a flag for "do we want a native or compat > layout for cmsg" in there. While your current hack seems like a nice short term improvement I think we need an iov_iter or iov_iter-light there in the long run. Same for ioctl so that we can pass properly typed kernel or user buffers through without all these set_fs hacks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.