[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:34:56 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/38] ext4: Define usercopy region in ext4_inode_cache
slab cache
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:05:14PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 06:02:45PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> The ext4 symlink pathnames, stored in struct ext4_inode_info.i_data
> >> and therefore contained in the ext4_inode_cache slab cache, need
> >> to be copied to/from userspace.
> >
> > Symlink operations to/from userspace aren't common or in the hot path,
> > and when they are in i_data, limited to at most 60 bytes. Is it worth
> > it to copy through a bounce buffer so as to disallow any usercopies
> > into struct ext4_inode_info?
>
> If this is the only place it's exposed, yeah, that might be a way to
> avoid the per-FS patches. This would, AIUI, require changing
> readlink_copy() to include a bounce buffer, and that would require an
> allocation. I kind of prefer just leaving the per-FS whitelists, as
> then there's no global overhead added.
I think Ted was proposing having a per-FS patch that would, say, copy
up to 60 bytes to the stack, then memcpy it into the ext4_inode_info.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
