[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 12:55:29 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/36] Hardened usercopy whitelisting
v4:
- refactor reporting to include offset and remove %p
- explicitly WARN by default for the whitelisting
- add KVM whitelists and harden ioctl handling
v3:
- added LKDTM update patch
- downgrade BUGs to WARNs and fail closed
- add Acks/Reviews from v2
v2:
- added tracing of allocation and usage
- refactored solutions for task_struct
- split up network patches for readability
I intend for this to land via my usercopy hardening tree, so Acks,
Reviewed, and Tested-bys would be greatly appreciated. FWIW, the bulk of
this series has survived for months in 0-day testing and -next, with the
more recently-added offset-reporting having existed there for a week.
Linus, getting your attention early on this -- instead of during the
merge window :) -- would be greatly appreciated. I'm hoping this is a
good time, in a slight lull in PTI and related things needing attention.
----
This series is modified from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY code
in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on our understanding
of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are ours and
don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code.
David Windsor did the bulk of the porting, refactoring, splitting,
testing, etc; I did some extra tweaks, hunk moving, traces, and extra
patches.
Description from patch 1:
Currently, hardened usercopy performs dynamic bounds checking on slab
cache objects. This is good, but still leaves a lot of kernel memory
available to be copied to/from userspace in the face of bugs. To further
restrict what memory is available for copying, this creates a way to
whitelist specific areas of a given slab cache object for copying to/from
userspace, allowing much finer granularity of access control. Slab caches
that are never exposed to userspace can declare no whitelist for their
objects, thereby keeping them unavailable to userspace via dynamic copy
operations. (Note, an implicit form of whitelisting is the use of constant
sizes in usercopy operations and get_user()/put_user(); these bypass
hardened usercopy checks since these sizes cannot change at runtime.)
To support this whitelist annotation, usercopy region offset and size
members are added to struct kmem_cache. The slab allocator receives a
new function, kmem_cache_create_usercopy(), that creates a new cache
with a usercopy region defined, suitable for declaring spans of fields
within the objects that get copied to/from userspace.
In this patch, the default kmem_cache_create() marks the entire allocation
as whitelisted, leaving it semantically unchanged. Once all fine-grained
whitelists have been added (in subsequent patches), this will be changed
to a usersize of 0, making caches created with kmem_cache_create() not
copyable to/from userspace.
After the entire usercopy whitelist series is applied, less than 15%
of the slab cache memory remains exposed to potential usercopy bugs
after a fresh boot:
Total Slab Memory: 48074720
Usercopyable Memory: 6367532 13.2%
task_struct 0.2% 4480/1630720
RAW 0.3% 300/96000
RAWv6 2.1% 1408/64768
ext4_inode_cache 3.0% 269760/8740224
dentry 11.1% 585984/5273856
mm_struct 29.1% 54912/188448
kmalloc-8 100.0% 24576/24576
kmalloc-16 100.0% 28672/28672
kmalloc-32 100.0% 81920/81920
kmalloc-192 100.0% 96768/96768
kmalloc-128 100.0% 143360/143360
names_cache 100.0% 163840/163840
kmalloc-64 100.0% 167936/167936
kmalloc-256 100.0% 339968/339968
kmalloc-512 100.0% 350720/350720
kmalloc-96 100.0% 455616/455616
kmalloc-8192 100.0% 655360/655360
kmalloc-1024 100.0% 812032/812032
kmalloc-4096 100.0% 819200/819200
kmalloc-2048 100.0% 1310720/1310720
After some kernel build workloads, the percentage (mainly driven by
dentry and inode caches expanding) drops under 10%:
Total Slab Memory: 95516184
Usercopyable Memory: 8497452 8.8%
task_struct 0.2% 4000/1456000
RAW 0.3% 300/96000
RAWv6 2.1% 1408/64768
ext4_inode_cache 3.0% 1217280/39439872
dentry 11.1% 1623200/14608800
mm_struct 29.1% 73216/251264
kmalloc-8 100.0% 24576/24576
kmalloc-16 100.0% 28672/28672
kmalloc-32 100.0% 94208/94208
kmalloc-192 100.0% 96768/96768
kmalloc-128 100.0% 143360/143360
names_cache 100.0% 163840/163840
kmalloc-64 100.0% 245760/245760
kmalloc-256 100.0% 339968/339968
kmalloc-512 100.0% 350720/350720
kmalloc-96 100.0% 563520/563520
kmalloc-8192 100.0% 655360/655360
kmalloc-1024 100.0% 794624/794624
kmalloc-4096 100.0% 819200/819200
kmalloc-2048 100.0% 1257472/1257472
------
The patches are broken in several stages of changes:
Report offsets and drop %p usage:
[PATCH 01/36] usercopy: Remove pointer from overflow report
[PATCH 02/36] usercopy: Include offset in overflow report
[PATCH 03/36] lkdtm/usercopy: Adjust test to include an offset to
Prepare and whitelist kmalloc:
[PATCH 04/36] usercopy: Prepare for usercopy whitelisting
[PATCH 05/36] usercopy: WARN() on slab cache usercopy region
[PATCH 06/36] usercopy: Mark kmalloc caches as usercopy caches
Update VFS layer for symlinks and other inline storage:
[PATCH 07/36] dcache: Define usercopy region in dentry_cache slab
[PATCH 08/36] vfs: Define usercopy region in names_cache slab caches
[PATCH 09/36] vfs: Copy struct mount.mnt_id to userspace using
[PATCH 10/36] ext4: Define usercopy region in ext4_inode_cache slab
[PATCH 11/36] ext2: Define usercopy region in ext2_inode_cache slab
[PATCH 12/36] jfs: Define usercopy region in jfs_ip slab cache
[PATCH 13/36] befs: Define usercopy region in befs_inode_cache slab
[PATCH 14/36] exofs: Define usercopy region in exofs_inode_cache slab
[PATCH 15/36] orangefs: Define usercopy region in
[PATCH 16/36] ufs: Define usercopy region in ufs_inode_cache slab
[PATCH 17/36] vxfs: Define usercopy region in vxfs_inode slab cache
[PATCH 18/36] cifs: Define usercopy region in cifs_request slab cache
Update scsi layer for inline storage:
[PATCH 19/36] scsi: Define usercopy region in scsi_sense_cache slab
Whitelist a few network protocol-specific areas of memory:
[PATCH 20/36] net: Define usercopy region in struct proto slab cache
[PATCH 21/36] ip: Define usercopy region in IP proto slab cache
[PATCH 22/36] caif: Define usercopy region in caif proto slab cache
[PATCH 23/36] sctp: Define usercopy region in SCTP proto slab cache
[PATCH 24/36] sctp: Copy struct sctp_sock.autoclose to userspace
[PATCH 25/36] net: Restrict unwhitelisted proto caches to size 0
Whitelist areas of process memory:
[PATCH 26/36] fork: Define usercopy region in mm_struct slab caches
[PATCH 27/36] fork: Define usercopy region in thread_stack slab
Deal with per-architecture thread_struct whitelisting:
[PATCH 28/36] fork: Provide usercopy whitelisting for task_struct
[PATCH 29/36] x86: Implement thread_struct whitelist for hardened
[PATCH 30/36] arm64: Implement thread_struct whitelist for hardened
[PATCH 31/36] arm: Implement thread_struct whitelist for hardened
Update KVM for whitelisting:
[PATCH 32/36] kvm: whitelist struct kvm_vcpu_arch
[PATCH 33/36] kvm: x86: fix KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG ioctl
Make blacklisting the default, with optional fail-closed:
[PATCH 34/36] usercopy: Allow strict enforcement of whitelists
[PATCH 35/36] usercopy: Restrict non-usercopy caches to size 0
Update LKDTM:
[PATCH 36/36] lkdtm: Update usercopy tests for whitelisting
Thanks!
-Kees (and David)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
