Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:36:28 +0000
From: "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Tobin C. Harding"
	<me@...in.cc>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "Jason A. Donenfeld"
	<Jason@...c4.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Paolo Bonzini
	<pbonzini@...hat.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Tejun Heo
	<tj@...nel.org>, Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>, Greg KH
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches
	<joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, Sergey Senozhatsky
	<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>, "Daniel
 Micay" <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
	Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, "Linux Kernel Mailing
 List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Network Development
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, "Stephen
 Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px



> -----Original Message-----
> From: keescook@...gle.com [mailto:keescook@...gle.com] On Behalf Of Kees
> Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>; Tobin C. Harding
> <me@...in.cc>; kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com; Jason A. Donenfeld
> <Jason@...c4.com>; Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>; Paolo Bonzini
> <pbonzini@...hat.com>; Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>; Roberts, William C
> <william.c.roberts@...el.com>; Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>; Jordan Glover
> <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>; Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>;
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>; Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>; Ian
> Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>; Sergey Senozhatsky
> <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>; Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>;
> Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>;
> Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>; Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>; Daniel
> Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>; Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>; Radim
> Krcmár <rkrcmar@...hat.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>;
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Stephen Rothwell
> <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>; Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>;
> Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>; Dmitry Vyukov
> <dvyukov@...gle.com>; Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 4/5] vsprintf: add printk specifier %px
> 
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:07 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
> wrote:
> > From: Linus Torvalds
> >> Sent: 29 November 2017 02:29
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >    Let's add specifier %px as a
> >> > clear, opt-in, way to print a pointer and maintain some level of
> >> > isolation from all the other hex integer output within the Kernel.
> >>
> >> Yes, I like this model. It's easy and it's obvious ("'x' for hex"),
> >> and it gives people a good way to say "yes, I really want the actual
> >> address as hex" for if/when the hashed pointer doesn't work for some
> >> reason.
> >
> > Remind me to change every %p to %px on kernels that support it.
> >
> > Although the absolute values of pointers may not be useful, knowing
> > that two pointer differ by a small amount is useful.
> > It is also useful to know whether pointers are to stack, code, static
> > data or heap.
> >
> > This change to %p is going to make debugging a nightmare.
> 
> In the future, maybe we could have a knob: unhashed, hashed (default), or
> zeroed.

Isn't that just kptr_restrict and get us right back to the simpler patches I proposed?

> 
> -Kees
> 
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.