Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:12:59 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 next 0/5] Improve Module autoloading infrastructure On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > Now, the above will not necessarily work with a legacy /dev/ directory > where al the nodes have been pre-populated, and opening the device > node is supposed to load the module. So _historically_ we did indeed > load modules as normal users. But does that really happen any more? Sadly, it looks like bluetoothd actually does expect to load the bt-proto-XYZ modules with no capabilities at all. So apparently we really do depend on not needing capabilities for module loading. Oh well. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.