Openwall GNU/*/Linux - a small security-enhanced Linux distro for servers
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:29:15 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, 
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>, 
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>, 
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW, myself doing a build at d9e12200852d with and without
> GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT _appears_ to produce identical objdump output
> where I did spot-checks.

That would probably be a good thing to check anyway - check the
difference between GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT on and off at that commit.

Just do

   objdump --disassemble vmlinux > file

and compare the two files for where the differences start occurring.

                 Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Your e-mail address:

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.