Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 21:29:15 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@...too.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11 On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > > FWIW, myself doing a build at d9e12200852d with and without > GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT _appears_ to produce identical objdump output > where I did spot-checks. That would probably be a good thing to check anyway - check the difference between GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT on and off at that commit. Just do objdump --disassemble vmlinux > file and compare the two files for where the differences start occurring. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.