Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:38:00 +0100 From: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 6/7] proc: support new 'pids=all|ptraceable' mount option On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> wrote: >> This patch introduces the new 'pids' mount option, as it was discussed >> and suggested by Andy Lutomirski . >> >> * If 'pids=' is passed without 'newinstance' then it has no effect. > > Would it be safer this were an error instead? Hm, I tend to say that you are right, but I also keep your comment when you said that "newinstance" should be the default later and users won't have to explicitly pass it. What you think ? -- tixxdz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.