Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:35:16 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:15:59 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote: > > Does %p[FfSs] leak addresses? Well, I guess it does if they are not > > found in kallsyms, but otherwise you have: > > > > function+0x<offset> > > You are correct %pF and %pS print an offset. Does this provide an attack vector, > I didn't think so but I'm no security expert. If they do then we need to amend > those calls also. Hopefully not. We changed stack dumps to use them only instead of showing addresses because of the location leak. -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.