Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:11:40 +0200 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add %pX specifier Hi Linus, On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > (NOTE! Using jhash here is not acceptable, since it's not > cryptographically safe, but think of it as an example of a hash that > takes 32-bit input). Ahh, yes, I should have continued to read the thread before replying my first reply. Indeed the correct functions to use would be siphash_1u32 or siphash_1u64, depending. Depending on the popularity of that, we might even consider making a siphash_1ulong helper, I suppose. Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.