Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 21:13:39 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>, 
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, 
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, 
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, 
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, William Roberts <william.c.roberts@...el.com>, 
	Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 4/6] lib: vsprintf: default
 kptr_restrict to the maximum value

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> So I honestly doubt the value of kptr_restrict. Any *sane* policy
>> pretty much has to be in the caller, and by thinking about what you
>> print out. IOW, things like proc_pid_wchan().
>
> Looking at /proc/kallsyms is actually a prime example of this.
>
> IOW, the old "open /proc/kallsyms as a normal user, then make it stdin
> for some suid-root program that can be fooled to output it probably
> works on it.

Actually, /proc/kallsyms uses %pK, which hacks around this issue
by checking for `euid != uid` in addition to the capability check - so this
isn't exploitable through a typical setuid program.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.