Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:47:16 +0300 From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com> To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes@...ined-monkey.org> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] memory allocations in genalloc Hi, On 18/08/17 16:57, Laura Abbott wrote: > Again, if you have a specific patch or > proposal this would be easier to review. yes, I'm preparing it and will send it out soon, but it was somehow surprising to me that it was chosen to implement free with the size parameter. It made me think that I was overlooking some obvious reason behind the choice :-S -- thanks for answering, igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.