[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 15:10:43 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: David Gens <david.gens@...tu-darmstadt.de>, Mathias Krause
<minipli@...glemail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Daniel Cegiełka
<daniel.cegielka@...il.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: It looks like there will be no more public
versions of PaX and Grsec.
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 10:59 +0200, David Gens wrote:
> I guess it would be nice to have a list of features that will be
> ported
> into KSPP,
> e.g., sorted by priority, and then users could easily check when to
> switch from the
> last PaX patches. But thats not how kernel development works
> (traditionally), because
> developers push features they (or their employers) are interested in.
That is the difference between development and support.
Developers will continue to do things, on their own schedule
and/or the schedule of their employers.
If you want grsecurity support, your best bet right now
is to pay grsecurity.
--
All rights reversed
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
