[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:14:17 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: "Eddie Kovsky" <ewk@...ovsky.org>
Cc: <jeyu@...hat.com>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, <keescook@...omium.org>, "KY
Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] module: verify address is read-only
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:58:42 -0800
"Eddie Kovsky" <ewk@...ovsky.org> wrote:
> Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in
> the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the exsiting functions
> that test if an address is inside a module's text section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@...ovsky.org>
I don't see the point of this for many of the hyper-v functions.
They are only called from a small number of places, and this can be validated
by code inspection. Adding this seems just seems to be code bloat to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
