[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:49:42 -0800
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, He Chen <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: VMX: Simplify segment_base
Can we use the read-only GDT here? When expanding the virtual address
for 64-bit system descriptors, isn't it sufficient to check (d->s == 0
&& d->type != 0)?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> wrote:
> The KVM segment_base function is confusing. This patch replaces integers
> with appropriate flags, simplify constructs and add comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
> ---
> Based on next-20170213
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 99167f20bc34..edb8326108dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -2062,25 +2062,35 @@ static unsigned long segment_base(u16 selector)
> struct desc_struct *d;
> unsigned long table_base;
> unsigned long v;
> + u32 high32;
>
> - if (!(selector & ~3))
> + if (!(selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
> return 0;
>
> - table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr();
> -
> - if (selector & 4) { /* from ldt */
> + /* LDT selector */
> + if ((selector & SEGMENT_TI_MASK) == SEGMENT_LDT) {
> u16 ldt_selector = kvm_read_ldt();
>
> - if (!(ldt_selector & ~3))
> + if (!(ldt_selector & ~SEGMENT_RPL_MASK))
> return 0;
>
> table_base = segment_base(ldt_selector);
> + } else {
> + table_base = get_current_gdt_rw_vaddr();
> }
> - d = (struct desc_struct *)(table_base + (selector & ~7));
> +
> + d = (struct desc_struct *)table_base + (selector >> 3);
> v = get_desc_base(d);
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == 2 || d->type == 9 || d->type == 11))
> - v |= ((unsigned long)((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3) << 32;
> + /*
> + * Extend the virtual address if we have a system descriptor entry for
> + * LDT or TSS (available or busy).
> + */
> + if (d->s == 0 && (d->type == DESC_LDT || d->type == DESC_TSS ||
> + d->type == 11/*Busy TSS */)) {
> + high32 = ((struct ldttss_desc64 *)d)->base3;
> + v |= (u64)high32 << 32;
> + }
> #endif
> return v;
> }
> --
> 2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
