[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:34:06 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] procfs: use an enum for possible hidepid values
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:16:30 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:23 AM, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@...il.com>
> >
> > Previously, the hidepid parameter was checked by comparing literal
> > integers 0, 1, 2. Let's add a proper enum for this, to make the checking
> > more expressive:
> >
> > 0 ___ HIDEPID_OFF
> > 1 ___ HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS
> > 2 ___ HIDEPID_INVISIBLE
> >
> > This changes the internal labelling only, the userspace-facing interface
> > remains unmodified, and still works with literal integers 0, 1, 2.
> >
> > No functional changes.
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > Acked-by: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lafcadio Wluiki <wluikil@...il.com>
>
> Andrew, can you take this? It's a sensible cleanup to drop literals in
> favor of defines.
Sure.
Djalal, I converted your acked-by into a signed-off-by, as described in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches (soon to become
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
