Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, elena.reshetova@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, h.peter.anvin@...el.com, will.deacon@....com, dwindsor@...il.com, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups... Hi, After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;) Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc. The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial refcount_t patch, too. Thanks! -Kees
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.