kernel-hardening - [PATCH 0/4] refcount

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri,  3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	elena.reshetova@...el.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	arnd@...db.de,
	tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...nel.org,
	h.peter.anvin@...el.com,
	will.deacon@....com,
	dwindsor@...il.com,
	Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
	dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups...

Hi,

After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some
changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;)

Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your
series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc.

The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial
refcount_t patch, too.

Thanks!

-Kees

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.